...IT DEPENDS ON YOU SAVE THE NEWSPAPERS FOR A WEEK. THEN CUT OUT ARTICLES THAT YOU BELIEVE GIVE EXAMPLES OF EITHER SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING ISSUES. Causes and effects in an advanced technological society are so widespread and so hard to match together, that experts and techniques ordinary people can't understand ARE/ ARE NOT needed to separate the important from the unimportant in order to make intelligent decisions. The real danger IS/IS NOT an increasing tendency to leave decisions that the people and their representatives used to debate and decide to groups of independent experts and technicians, elected by nobody and responsible to nobody. If our society is becoming more indirect -- we're having more trouble trying to see the connections between what happened and what caused it -- then direct participation in government IS/IS NOT becoming less relevant. The idea that an election for president every four years represents a chance to speak out on all the decisions society faces for the next four years IS/IS NOT adequate to contemporary needs. There IS/IS NOT a way that participation in the old-fashioned use of the word can substitute for the experts and modern decision-making techniques government must use today. ORGANIZE A DEBATE ON THE FOLLOWING: RESOLVED: The nation needs a new version of democracy and new political institutions more adequate to the realities of a modern technological society than what exists at present. CHOOSE TWO SPEAKERS FOR EACH SIDE, ONE TO PRESENT THE ARGUMENTS, AND ONE T0 REBATE THE OTHER SIDE'S ARGUMENT. THE SPEAKER FOR THE AFFIRMATIVE SPEAKS FIRST. THE SPEAKER FOR THE NEGATIVE SPEAKS NEXT. THE SPEAKER REBUTTING THE AFFIRMATIVE SPEAKS NEXT. THE SPEAKER REBUTTING THE NEGATIVE SPEAKS LAST. USE ANYTHING IN THIS PAMPHLET FOR EVIDENCE, AS wELL AS ANYTHING ELSE You CAN FIND THAT IS RELEVANT. THE REST or THE CLASS WILL ACT AS A JURY. [image]