PROSECUTOR MANAGEMENT INFORMATI0N SYSTEM by Susan Hastings PROMIS (Prosecutor's Management Information Sys- tem) is a computer-based system for public prosecution agencies. Developed by the Institute for Law and Social Research under a grant from the U.S. Department of Justice Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA), PROMIS has been in operation in Washington, D.C. since January 1971. [image] While there can be no substitute for skilled, experienced prosecutors, PROMIS permits a prosecutor's office to accumulate a wealth of information on each of its burgeoning cases and maximize what manpower is available by assuring that office operations are conducted in the context of modern managerial and administrative methods. As a prosecutor finds he can devote more time to priority areas, he can more efficiently exert positive and productive control over his workload. One of the most important functions of PROMIS is its ability to screen the massive influx of information with which prosecutor's offices are faced. Facts are the raw material for the prosecutor. The decisions he makes about a case are based on the soundness of the facts that are available. PROMIS's computerized data base enables prosecutors to acquire and process facts in a consistently comprehensive and uniform matter. PROMIS gives prosecutors a method by which they can evaluate and rate cases in terms of the gravity of the crime and the accused criminal's background. Cases can be rated evenly through computer-generated numerical scores, thus giving the chief prosecutor the managerial leverage he needs to apportion his office's time and manpower according to the relative importance of pending cases. He can then assign the priority for more intensive pre-trial preparation to the cases which involve violent crime and habitual criminals. Because of the massive caseload faced by prosecutor's offices, many serious offenders often avoid proper punishment because the responsibility for their cases has been fragmented and/or delayed to the point where the court-wise repeat defendant is able to maneuver his case through the cracks in the system. PROMIS however, can help to alleviate this problem by generating, five days ahead of time, a calendar that ranks in descending order of importance the cases a court will try on a particular day. The prosecutor's office can than allocate its manpower to prepare itself sufficiently for the most serious cases. The judicial process cannot function without the active cooperation of citizen jurors and witnesses, but witnesses are often disillusioned by court scheduling conflicts. PROMIS enables a Witness Notification Unit to locate and subpoena witnesses in order to schedule their appearance in court. It also tries to provide a coordination of scheduling that is convenient to everyone in order to avoid the delays that often prove inconvenient, confusing and unnecessarily frustrating. The implementation of PROMIS in Washington, D.C. has heightened awareness about the utility of legal paraprofessionals. These non-lawyer college graduates perform time-consuming duties that do not require the specialized training of an attorney. PROMIS made it obvious that full documentation of reasons for prosecutorial actions was not being made, and the visibility of this problem led to the creation of the paralegal positions. As the procedures of the prosecutor's office became better structured and more systematized through PROMIS, there is indication that more and more tasks will fall within the capabilities of paralegals, and skilled attorneys will be able to direct their abilities more fully toward case preparation and prosecution. Additionally, errors and omissions which might occur when an overtaxed attorney is charged with the duties of citizen interviews and case documentation, might be lessened as paraprofessionals take over this ministerial task. Just as PROMIS has demonstrated the need for paralegals, it can also be used to pinpoint the areas in which they should be trained. PROMIS-produced data which can gauge the effectiveness of a given training program can also indicate areas in which prosecutors themselves need further training. [image] The reach of the prosecutor extends from one end of the criminal iustice system to the other, starting with the police and ending with corrections. With the advent of PROMIS, prosecutors possess a potent tool that will help them take full advantage of their position within the system. A 1970 statement by Chief Justice Warren E. Burger expresses the need that people in this country feel for such an aid; "In the supermarket age, we are trying to operate the courts with cracker-barrel corner grocer methods and equipment - vintage 1900 . . . the judicial processes for resolving cases and controversies have remained essentially static for 200 years. That is not necessarily bad, but when courts are not able to keep up with their work it suggests the need for a hard new look at our procedures." A method like PROMIS that enables prosecutor's offices to collect data on a routine and systematic basis, may well prove the answer to increasing the effectiveness of our criminal court system. [For more information, write C. Madison Brewer, Institute for Law and Social Research, 1125 15th St. NW, Suite 625. Washington, D.C. 20005.] 86