Hard Drive Controller
From: Robert Berry (ap241@cleveland.Freenet.Edu)
Date: 02/28/91-11:17:10 AM Z
- Next message by date: Ron Abrams: "ASCII Files"
- Previous message by date: Chris Infante: "U.S. Doublers"
- Next in thread: Ed Krimen: "Re: Hard Drive Controller"
- Maybe reply: Ed Krimen: "Re: Hard Drive Controller"
- Return to Index: Sort by: [ date ] [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ]
From: ap241@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Robert Berry) Subject: Hard Drive Controller Date: Thu Feb 28 11:17:10 1991 I have the chance to buy a 65 meg hard drive from another local ST user. He said it has everything with it except the controller; it was originally an Atari 20 meg drive, but he upgraded it to a 40 meg MFM. The existing controller got zapped by lightning, so he replaced it with an RLL controller, which he says allows the drive to be formatted to 65 megs. He's keeping the controller to use with his Mega 2 that he plans to buy when he sells his present system. My question is: Is this method reliable? What kind of controller would I need (i.e., one that works with an XT, AT, SCSI, etc.; I found these different models while searching through an issue of Computer Shopper)? I can't make heads or tails out of those ads in Computer Shopper, but I was just wondering if the Atari drives use the same kind of controllers that IBM-compatible hard drives use. **********Answered by Peter Haller: 02/28/1991**************** Robert: First a little clarification: A harddrive (HD), by itself is dumb. It is able to physically write to its media and that is all. In order for a HD to talk to a computer an interface is requried. This interface is two fold: 1) a means for the computer to talk to the HD, and 2) a 'protocol' that the drive will store the information on to the HD. MFM and RLL are 'protocols'. SCSI ( pronouced 'SCUZZY') is an interface to the protocol, and many other things as well. Two types of drives exist on the market today: 1) HD that have imbedded SCSI 2) drives that are either RLL or MFM. (There are other types, ESDI for example, but as far as I know no interface for the ST for this type.) A SCSI 'embedded' drive needs no extra card in between the host SCSI adapter (ie ICD host adapter). Most of these drives are RLL now, though don't hold me to this. The second type requires a extra card between the host SCSI adapter and the drive - a translator, if you will. Now, with everything a little clearer, I can tell you what you want to know.... Bad news: NO, an IBM (PC) compatible RLL, MFM, or SCSI adapter will not help you here. (Read not compatible.) This is simply that most controllers for the PCs are designed for the XT/AT bus - expansion slots. Good News: A HD that works on a PC will work on the ST, if you have the correct hardware to interface to it - and it is either MFM, RLL, or SCSI. Now, what you need to do is, buy a host adaptor for the ST: ICD makes what has become a defacto standard for Atari, though Supra also makes one. This host adaptor is SCSI based, and connects to the DMA (Direct Memory Access) port on the ST - you know the connector that doesn't get used by anything. With this adaptor connected to the ST any SCSI embedded HD can be connected to the ST. If your HD is not SCSI embedded, you will need that 'inbetween' card that connects the HD to the SCSI card. Again, ICD sells these cards. Simple, right? Well, it really is, though I haven't gotten into power supplies and such. As far as using an RLL controller with a MFM drive, well I have never heard of that - it sounds wrong, but then again somebody may have figured something out. I will investigate this further. Look in the Programmers and Developing Forum in this Sig under the Information & Ideas menu selection for added information. Thanks for the Question! Peter Haller [ae302] Hallsound Systems & Software ###
- Next message by date: Ron Abrams: "ASCII Files"
- Previous message by date: Chris Infante: "U.S. Doublers"
- Next in thread: Ed Krimen: "Re: Hard Drive Controller"
- Maybe reply: Ed Krimen: "Re: Hard Drive Controller"
----------------------------------------- Return to message index